CORRESPONDENCE TO BESCHLOSS

You were seen on C-Span 2 today. A passage from one of your novels in which you called Khruschev the antichrist was shown on the television during the presentation. Mr. Beschloss, you say that history books should be non-fiction, yet it’s fiction. Although you could want to describe the remark as a metaphor or other figure of speech, it would be more accurate to describe it as poor theology and wrong teaching that might mislead readers and perhaps even contribute to their damnation. It is quite possible that those who assist in consigning others to hell will end up there as well. The greatest teacher who has ever walked on earth, Jesus, claims that those who don’t believe in hell will change their minds once they get there and that hell lasts eternally for those who get there, which is most people. There is weeping and gnashing of teeth in hell, where the fire never goes out and their worms never die. The holy bible is a history book that ought to be essential reading for anybody who want to create history books. Khruschev was not the antichrist (or the beast, as in the mark of the beast), as you would see if you read it. The antichrist is a guy who would control the whole globe for seven years known as the great tribulation. However, it became evident at the time of his passing that none of the world’s leaders—including Hitler, Mussolini, and Alexander the Great—had ever held power—including Khruschev, whom an incorrect author had called the antichrist. I am aware that the author claimed that Mussolini was the antichrist and subsequently said, I would give my right arm not to have written that book. You will be chastised by the Lord for calling Khruschev the antichrist.

I love myBlogd

hanging_with_my_gnomies

See author's posts