The capability of NATO to unite the armed forces of its 28 member nations in pursuit of a shared objective is immense. Naturally, there are a lot of obstacles to overcome when attempting to collaborate across several, distinct businesses. The sharing of military hardware is one area where this is shown. With its assets dispersed across many countries and potentially with lifespans of several decades, it may be challenging for a single military agency to maintain track of them all. Lending out the equipment to other groups adds another level of intricacy. Defense agencies are using unique identification of things (iuid) as a solution to aid with asset monitoring. Equipment that is valuable or deemed mission vital is assigned a globally unique identity that it keeps with it for the duration of its existence. Governments have created guidelines that cover every aspect of iuid labeling. The U.K. has def stan 05-132, whereas the U.S. has mil-std-130. In an effort to further standardize iuid systems, NATO has released its own specifications. The Allied Unique Identification of Items Publication (auidp-1) and related document (stanag-2290) have been made available by the organization.When creating their own IUID standards, several military ministries consult the NATO requirements. Def stan 05-132, stanag 2290, and mil-std-130 are examples of iuid standards that address themes like what information should be included in an item’s unique identification and how the information should be structured. The identification is applied directly to the object or is affixed with a label or plate. It is encoded in a 2D data matrix symbol. The iuid scanner is used to read the symbol. For all users to be able to read and understand the information, departments must use the same identification format. The requirements cover the proper placement and size of the data matrix sign on the object it is meant to identify. Additionally, techniques for confirming the data matrix symbol’s readability are described. For a contractor delivering equipment to a military agency, the comparable but differing requirements for iuid labeling and their complexity might be bewildering. Speaking with a business that specializes in this area may be beneficial. For instance, id-integration inc. is well-versed in the numerous standards, such as def stan 05-132 and stanag 2290, and has over 12 years of expertise with iuid systems. Go to id-integration.com for further details. Nancy Malone is an applications engineer with a strong interest in and involvement with new computer software and technology. In terms of uid compliance and verification, she is among the most important resources. She often writes on id integration’s latest advancements, which are available at id-integration.com. If approached, she may provide further details about uid. kindly follow me on Google+