Because the aesthetic zone is so important to both the outward look and the internal feelings of a patient, achieving a bioesthetic outcome is an essential need in the treatment process. All too often, this is made more difficult when the cosmetic goals of the patient interfere with the health of the periodontal complex. This is often the case when iatrogenic breaches of the biologic breadth have taken place. There are a number of variables that might have contributed to these failures; however, the intracrevicular margin position and excessively contoured restorations are the two primary causes. Not only is the formation of plaque a concern, but also the supracrestal fibers get disrupted, which leads to the tissues becoming even more irritated and difficult to handle from an aesthetic standpoint. The landmark research conducted by kois found that the complete dentogingival complex (dgc) is clinically predictable at a distance of 3.0 millimeters on the direct facial aspect and at a distance of 3.0-5.0 millimeters interproximally when measured from the free gingival border to the osseous crest. When seen from the front, it is essential that the gingival margin imitates the osseous scallop while yet preserving the dgc. 1 The degree of inflammation in the soft tissue, which affects the clinical development of health and aesthetic symmetry, adds an additional layer of complexity to the circumstances that are already rather complicated. Dental lasers have seen significant development as an adjuvant and alternative therapy in recent years. Their primary functions include the safe, conservative, and reliable reduction of bacterial levels as well as the improvement of the hard and soft tissue shapes. In many cases, the patient is dissatisfied with the poor cosmetic results that he or she has previously received; yet, in order to strengthen the periodontal framework and produce an optimal outcome, the patient must be sent to yet another expert. Reflective mucoperiosteal surgery creates a longer healing period than other types of surgery, which makes the process even more difficult. This not only alters the timeline of the patient’s final restorative therapy, but it also puts the patient’s ultimate pleasure and happiness at least two to three months farther in the future. Dental lasers have, thankfully, undergone significant development as an adjuvant and alternative therapy in recent years. These lasers may now consistently, safely, and conservatively reduce bacterial levels while also improving the hard and soft tissue shapes.