MALAYSIA AIRLINES FLIGHT 370: MY ANALYSIS OF WHY THE OFFICIAL EXPLANATION IS AN ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL THE TRUTH

There are inconsistencies in the official account of the events surrounding the disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight 370. In the aftermath of the jet’s unexplained disappearance and the egregiously negligent management of the flight’s radar signal, the Malaysian authorities would have us believe that no survivors were recovered when the plane crashed somewhere in the Indian Ocean. This isn’t adding up for many reasons. In the mainstream media, claims of a blatant cover-up have been completely downplayed. These are the arguments that point to a clear cover-up. 1. if the jet had fallen into the indian ocean it would have left a significant trail of wreckage floating on the water, seats foam and plastic… etc. which would have been readily discovered. This debris is still missing. 2. It was reported that Flight 370 had veered off course and vanished while continuing to send data signals for over four hours. The point is that, had it known that it had been sending data signals, the plane could have traveled as far afield as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, or possibly North Korea. Is it possible that this information was simply forgotten by the mainstream media, as it was never mentioned when the Malaysian government released its official explanation? The explanation of a plane crash in the Indian Ocean suggests that the aircraft did not go very far, which makes it inconsistent with the amount of time and distance it continued to fly. 3. There is no evidence to support the official explanation, including no debris or dead bodies recovered from the Indian Ocean, no data recorded, and no witnesses to attest to it. Was the official explanation the Malaysian government’s attempt to create a scene to deflect attention from the fact that they handled flight 370 with such incompetence? 4. Another element that has gone unnoticed by mainstream media is that the plane’s transponder, which was a mechanism for sending off communication signals, was turned off voluntarily. Why would it have been necessary to turn off the transponder if the pilot or pilots had been determined to crash the aircraft into the ocean as a suicide mission? Perhaps stating that it was turned off to avoid detection on the newly chosen flight route would be a more plausible answer. Finally, the evidence indicates that the official explanation is a cover-up while the mystery is still unsolved and that the pilot or pilots would not have needed to do all of the skillful maneuvers that have been recorded. The aircraft disappeared, where was it? What became to the people that survived? Does this imply that the aircraft is now being used as a covert weapon, following its own path? There is even more absurdity to it all. There are similarities between this and 911 in that there is evidence of a cover-up and the official account does not match up. Although there was no debris in the Indian Ocean at the time I wrote this piece, as I have said, it wouldn’t surprise me if some were eventually placed to support the official story. If you enjoyed reading this essay, you can find more like ones, including a free PDF download, at www.newparadigm.ws. Paul A. Philips is the presenter of newparadigm, a doorway to transformation, awareness, spirituality, mind, body, health, and alternative media, among many other things. The URL is once again as follows: http://www.newparadigm.ws/

I love myBlogd

MelonSmasher

See author's posts