Russian and Iranian allies maintain a never-ending campaign of misinformation in which they either connect the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to Saudi Arabia or label it as a product of the United States of America and Israel. The truth of the problem is that the ISI and CIA Joint operations were the ones that provided funding and developed the Mujahedeen in order to deal with covert methods in order to combat the Soviet Union. However, the branch of those Mujahedeen, which were the Taliban and Al Qaeda, resulted in the formation of those organizations. This was exploited against them successfully. The CIA did not anticipate this happening. When a First Information Report (FIR) is filed at a crime site, the beneficiary of the crime is often the subject of the investigation. In the case of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), is there anybody who can point me in the direction of the benefit in situations when Sunni governments or areas have been destabilized and their image has been harmed as a result of what the ISIS has done? Why would Saudi Arabia or the United States tarnish the image of Sunnis or destabilize Sunni states, which would in turn benefit the Iranian block? Iran had been competing to promote pro-Iranian states based on their religious beliefs from Pakistan all the way to Lebanon in the Middle East. Why would they do this? Although there being no Shia presence among the Palestinian Arabs, the issue arises as to why the Iranians provide financial and logistical support to the Sunni Hamas in order to maintain their animosity against Israel by attacking them with missile strikes that are not warranted. Due to the retaliatory actions taken by Israeli security forces, this led to significant casualties among Palestinians. When it comes to working on the Iranian agenda, where is the rationality in dealing with terrorist acts carried out by Sunnis? In the past, Iran has engaged in conflict with Sunni governments. During what period of history did Iran engage in a struggle to defend the rights of Sunnis? What could possibly be the history of that? modify its path, which would result in Iranian logistical and financial backing to Hamas in the heart of a population of Palestinian Arabs that is entirely comprised of Sunni Muslims? At the conclusion of all of these adventures that were arranged by Iranian help, whether through direct support or support from a secret third party, the Iranians, in conjunction with China and Russia, are calling for their united stance to fight against terror networks. In point of fact, this is directed against the Sunnis, and it affords Iranian plans the opportunity to be pushed via covert ways. Furthermore, it makes efficient use of social media in order to alter public opinion in western countries. China is confronted with the twenty million Sunnis of Xinjiang, while Russia is confronted with the Sunnis of Chechnya in its oil-rich territory. Iran, Syria, Russia, and China all have a common adversary, which is the Sunni population. The Sunni population accounts for 85 percent of the world’s 23 percent Muslim population, making it the second largest religion in the world after Christianity. The fact that a small number of Taliban or other extremist leaders, like Gulbadin Hekmatyar, sought asylum in Iran after the United States’ military intervention in Afghanistan in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks is a fact that is unknown to a very small number of individuals. If Iran had compassion for people who were tied to the Taliban, why was that? By providing covert logistical assistance to Sunni terrorist groups, the Iranian covert operation is successfully succeeding in harming public attitudes of Sunni governments. This is effectively pushed via the Iranian government’s clandestine operation. The Sunni Arabs, along with other countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan, have been friends of the United States. This is causing damage to the intrinsic support that the United States has in the Muslim world via Iranian covert activities, which is beneficial to both Russia and Iran. This is because they are being portrayed through the lens of terrorists. Permit me to ask a couple questions: Who is responsible for the upkeep of the clerics’ government in the Muslim world via the use of popular mandate? Would you not consider it to be a rogue state that has been proclaimed by the West? Please name a single Sunni state that has provided a mandate to the Taliban, Al Qaeda, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) by a public consensus. If it is not the case, then what does that imply? CONCLUSION: There is a problem in the fact that open-ended inquiries have not been used to evaluate the undercurrents, which include the events that have occurred in Syria. Perceptions on the success of the Iranian-Russian nexus will be gathered via the use of the structured questionnaire. The conclusion that has to be reached is one that is objective, genuine, and convincing. Policies in the United States of America need to be astute in order to comprehend the underlying phenomena. It is being propagated by Iranian agents that the phrase “Wahabism” is being misused in order to create a division among the Sunni nations, which is not true that the word is being utilized. Please be aware that we are firm believers in the concept of religious peace, and that this post in no way is directed at any particular group or sect. The extremist elements of both the Shia and Sunni faiths have been criticized in equal measure. Saudi Arabia has issued a warning that there is no future for Assad in Syria, according to a report published by The Guardian on September 30, 2015.
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com