Article 3 of the 7-part realitysculp series is available here. Perception is the next stage in the cycle, continuing from part 2 of the realitysculp series. Prior to proceeding, it is crucial to comprehend the definition of perception as it is used throughout the cycle. According to Wikipedia, perception is the process of organizing, recognizing, and interpreting sensory data in order to depict and comprehend the outside world. It goes on to say that: impulses in the neurological system that arise from chemical or physical stimulation of the sense organs are involved in all perception. Although this definition is true in every way, its general incompleteness makes it confusing as well. According to Wikipedia, perception is seen as completely objective and detached from the human mind. A perspective like that is not possible to be comprehensive as then everyone who is given the exact same facts will always interpret it in the same manner. Take a look at the updated definition that follows: the process of organizing, identifying, and interpreting sensory input in light of one’s own worldview in order to accept, reject, take into account, represent, classify, and allocate data placement into the intended context. Furthermore, impulses in the neurological system that are triggered by chemical or physical stimulation of the sense organs are filtered according to an individual’s education and experience in order to form all perception. The perception process is a dynamic process that engages with an individual’s own experience, education, and worldview. Similar to data intake, perception is a crucial domain whereby the reality-scrap cycle may be intentionally influenced. When perception is seen as the dynamic process that it is, a number of potential targets for behavior modification and control become clear. We must examine perception in more detail before we can talk about how it might be manipulated to influence behavior. the arc filter: Data must go through many perception filters once it is received. Consider this to be the brain’s firewall. The context and substance of the data must first be assessed and examined for relevance. This is an essential skill since the human animal processes enormous volumes of data every second. There is so much information that if it were all brought to one’s notice, the person would become overwhelmed and unable to act. Data will first go via the accept, reject, or consider (arc) filter in order to avoid this overload. After being designated as acceptable or for consideration, data is sorted via a number of filters to determine its relevance, veracity, and significance. This process of giving the data qualities depending on how well it would fit into the existing worldview was referred to as adding color in earlier published descriptions. Assigning qualities or adding color depending on one’s worldview plays a significant role in the phenomenon where two individuals receive the same information but interpret it very differently. Beginning with the arc filter, as its name suggests, information is assessed for relevance depending on an individual’s worldview, background, and level of education. Consider the case of two adolescent females, one residing in Beverly Hills, California, and the other on an African savanna. Every female has a very distinct idea of what is significant. One day, the two girls are strolling by a tall greenery-filled field in their different corners of the earth. The foliage in each field is moving in tandem with the approach of an invisible entity. The girl’s eye records the visual information in each instance. This is where the arc filter’s world view effect shows up. The girl on the savanna is aware that she lives among some hazardous wild creatures. This knowledge is part of her worldview. Her schooling contributed to the development of her anxiety and worry for such risks, and her personal experience may have included knowing of others who might have been assaulted. The movement’s data is deemed pertinent and approved for her consideration. In order to get the information to the girl’s attention with the strongest emotional reaction possible, the qualities or color filters will designate it as important. In the meanwhile, the girl in Beverly Hills rejects this data as unimportant and doesn’t let it past her arc filer because, in her opinion, social media, her social standing, and the amount of money she can spend at the mall today are more important than this information. Because each female has a distinct worldview, the perception arc filter in our example treats the identical data input from both girls extremely differently. It is evident that the arc filter’s assessment of the data is influenced by the individual’s favorable perception of the importance of the information inside their worldview. This is the reason we see daily instances of many people being exposed to facts that challenges their opinions on various subjects, yet they choose to ignore or be unaffected by it. It also shows that people have some conscious control over their arc filter—that is, they have some say over the information they choose to take into account. The personal worldview is one that may be deliberately shaped. In the wild, a person’s worldview is shaped by their upbringing, social network, and life experiences. Despite being restricted to the immediate surroundings, these worldviews were helpful as they were effectively tailored to foster success in the setting in which the person lived. Leaders of these organizations later on, as humans began to organize, brought the idea of education. We should first talk about what the term education means. I came discovered a term online that fits in nicely with the conversation of how education can and will lead to behavior change. Think about this: Someone who is well-educated has correct perception, coherent thought processes, and successful behavior. Take note of how the definition uses the arbitrary phrases perceives accurately, thinks clearly, and acts effectively. Success can only be evaluated in relation to the subjective judgment from the standpoint of a certain world view since these phrases and the educational objectives they represent are subjective. Those in authority often had such opinion. Stated differently, one aim of education is to provide pupils the context or world view necessary for the behavior that results from allowed data intake to be considered effective by those who are teaching it. Realizing this also highlights the negative aspects of education. Consider the apparently never-ending argument between creationism and evolution. Which side of the argument a person who perceives accurately and thinks clearly is on would depend on their worldview. What the majority of common people don’t know is that historically, organizations vying for dominance have always aimed to influence children’s education. that is, the person in charge of the educational system molds pupils’ perspectives of the world in a way that benefits those who are teaching them. The government promoted the concept that public education is necessary in western countries for the common person to become a productive part of society, which benefits both the individual and society. As admirable as it may seem, the definition is again rife with arbitrary phrases like beneficialing and productive, with no explanation of who gets to decide what counts as a benefit or what is productive. In western countries, productive people often brought their leaders the benefits of using labor skills, whereas unproductive people did not provide any benefits to their leaders. The leaders were once again used to define benefit. Recall that these ideas predated welfare policies by a long shot, and self-sufficiency was the norm for both people and families. Thus, while obviously not a burden on a country, self-sufficient or self-reliant people did not improve the lives of the rich or the influence of our leaders. As a result, these people were ineffective and did not contribute. Like it or not, the fact is that Westerners’ worldview was shaped by an educational system whose aim was to mold each student’s unique sense of reality to align it with the objectives of those offering the education. Think about the following two claims: I know these things to be true because the Bible says so. These are the things that I discovered while pursuing my degree. You’re operating inside a worldview that has been given to you in order for you to perceive accurately, think clearly, and act effectively for the advantage and objectives of someone else if one or both of these assertions seem true to you. To make things worse, it becomes harder for someone to alter or adapt their worldview as they get older. This is mostly a psychological issue rather than a biological one. When a person enters maturity, their worldview is essentially set in stone. This is the reason it’s so important to force youngsters to adopt the ideal worldview. Only traumatic experiences or a persistent, deliberate effort on the part of the person may cause them to alter their perspective on the world. This study aims to promote that deliberate, focused effort since it is the only way for an individual to break free from their mental prison. When information is processed by the arc filter and it contradicts someone’s worldview, it is often discarded and never even brought to their attention. Sometimes contradictory data will be categorized by the arc filter for consideration rather than being discarded outright owing to discrepancies within a world view. Usually, the person will try to make sense of this knowledge in light of their worldview. In the majority of circumstances, the material will be deemed false and removed if they are unable to reconcile it. It’s intriguing when contradicting information that has been categorized for consideration is bolstered by evidence that has also bolstered information that was previously accepted in the person’s worldview. The only way to settle this conflict is for the individual’s worldview to change—either by embracing the new information or by rejecting the previously accepted information. Either way, it presents a chance for the person to acknowledge the limits of the perspective they have been granted. Although they are rare, these breaks in the mindcage system’s normally seamless operation are unpleasant for the person experiencing them. Over time, the mind learns to avoid material that might create such disturbances due to this discomfort, voluntarily. Accepting this process helps people from becoming involved in their own incarceration by preventing discomfort. Bob Jones writes on topics that are at the heart of our existence and is committed to raising awareness of the significance of events that have a significant impact on the security and quality of life of the average person. Rather than presenting a list of titles or literary honors, Jones applies common sense and reasoning to concepts and events that the general public is being kept ignorant of through education and the media. In addition, he publishes a website devoted to ending human suffering. Click the link to read more stories, or go to our website at http://www.dragontamers.com. linked articles: self-awareness, media control, and free thinking
I love myBlogd
