It is possible to trace the origins of feudalism in India back to the brahamdeya land concessions that were given to the brahmans. The injunctions found in religious literature that lauded the advantages of distributing property to brahmans were what gave the practice its stamp of approval and allowed it to continue. Even before the time of Maurya, it was common practice to make donations of this kind. During the first time of the grant, the grantee was permitted to enjoy the advantages of the grant; but, the monarch continued to retain administrative control over the gift. However, beginning in later times, notably after the Mauryan era, these land donations included the transfer of administrative privileges along with the ownership of the property. The awards that the satavahana monarch gautamiputra satakarni granted to the buddhist monks in the second century a.d. are where the earliest reference to giving up the test series for ias of administrative privileges can be found. The territory that had been provided to them was off limits to both the troops serving the monarch as well as the officials working for the government. Nevertheless, even this gift indicated the transfer of the monarch’s jurisdiction over salt, which indicates that the king maintained control over some other sources of income. However, at a later era, beginning during the reign of Pravarsena II Vaaktaka in the fifth century A.D., the transfer was finalized. This included meadows as well as buried valuables and deposits, which may have been mines. There is a contradiction between the time and the expansion of Indian feudalism. It is possible to deduce that there was a decrease in trade and commerce between the years 750 and 1200 AD based on the fact that coins were used less often during this time period. As a result of the decline in trade, artisans were forced to leave the cities and migrate to the villages, where they could find work, albeit at a subsistence level, allowing for the growth of an economically self-sufficient village economy. This has been cited as one of the reasons for the growth of an economically self-sufficient village economy. This self sufficient economy sustained itself for centuries and was not affected by the muslim rule of the country, as these rulers, despite being opposed to brahmans and polytheism, were not inclined to disturb the existing mode of production. This economy was not affected by the muslim rule of the country because it was self sufficient. When we are going to offer the IAS exam, we need all of the different sorts of historical facts, and we need to gather the most significant information about our history and the individuals who lived in it. By the time of the Gupta era, the custom was so widespread that even the feudatories were participating in the ritual by giving out grants. In some of these communities, the people, especially the farmers, were required to not only pay the customary dues to the done but also to follow their instruction. This was in addition to the payment of the dues. At this point in time, the monarchs still had the right to punish criminals or carry out justice for the people. Later on, these powers were also given to the donees, and their grants were referred to as abhyantarsidhhi and sa-danda-das-apradha. These names highlight the ability of donees to resolve internal disputes and punish offenders. As a result, a class of Brahaman feudatories emerged who were independent of royal officials and dominated their own regions.
I love myBlogd
