As previously reported by alternative news, Matt Campbell of West Sussex, England, is suing the BBC for allegedly covering up their 911 broadcast, which included his brother’s death. According to Matt, the broadcast violates anti-terrorist laws in the United Kingdom. that the BBC was engaged in the planned concealment and withholding of crucial, indisputable evidence related to the murder of his brother and others in the World Trade Center’s north tower on September 11, 2001.-Will the BBC be held accountable for aiding terrorists and terrorist acts? After carefully examining the evidence over the years, Matt will face the BBC equipped with a formidable attorney. He will call expert witnesses and make reference to those who are not in court. Matt will challenge the official 911 story, which claims that terrorists from al-Qaeda hijacked planes and crashed them into buildings. using the evidence from analyses provided by the witnesses with specialized knowledge in fields such as engineering, physics, demolition, architecture, and other disciplines.Matt will utilize his research to show the jury that controlled demolition, one of which resulted in his brother’s death, is what brought down the World Trade Center Building 7 and the Twin Towers. Consequently, Matt claims that the BBC knew in advance of producing the show how the buildings were brought down using controlled explosives and demolition. The BBC is implicated in the act of allowing the terrorists who are the true offenders to escape justice by excluding this information from the televised broadcast. While not all claims are supported by evidence, the following are examples that imply the structures were demolished by controlled demolition: 1. What is the 7-symmetrical collapse of free fall? The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) has evidence that at least eight stories of the WTC 7 collapsed with no resistance and free-fall acceleration. The internal structures, which included steel beams, columns, and horizontal crisscrosses, were severed in a matter of seconds, indicating that the collapse was the result of a carefully planned, controlled explosive demolition. 2. Was the BBC aware on that day that WTC 7 was due to collapse? The only high-rise structures that have ever entirely fallen due to an aircraft collision or fire during 911 are the twin towers, indicating a planned destruction. About seven hours after the twin towers collapsed, a reporter from BBC Live said that the WTC 7 will collapse about twenty minutes ahead of schedule! There was no fire, and the structure was entirely intact. Did the BBC realize the building was about to collapse and that the reporter had unintentionally revealed the news too soon? Why did the BBC not investigate this? 3. Was the BBC a tool for spreading false information? Despite numerous experts in the fields of physics, demolition, architecture, engineering, and other sciences, as well as witnesses like first responder firefighters who reported hearing multiple explosions, all pointing to a controlled demolition, the BBC chose to ignore this information. subsequently, after the program’s presentation, they declined to accept corrections based on evidence from the NIST verifying that free-fall was present during WTC 7’s collapse. 4. Accusations that the BBC has discredited information without providing a concrete justification for their incorrect views, utilizing smear campaigns, in defiance of the numerous requests from the public for the broadcaster to report the conclusions of the aforementioned witnesses and experts claiming demolition. These are a some of the problems that Matt and his team will be addressing in the next legal action. This is in violation of the BBC’s editorial rules for impartial programming. Visit http://www.newparadigm.ws for more relevant articles, blogs, and videos, including a free PDF download titled The Greater Way and the New Paradigm Experience, if you enjoyed reading this article. Paul A. Philips is the host. The URL is http://www.newparadigm.ws/ , once again.
I love myBlogd
