Introduction When it comes to specific views or values, people have a tendency to justify them, regardless of whether or not such beliefs or values are effective for a country regarding politics. Currently, they may consider them effective to varying degrees, but the statistics and history contradict the conclusions that they have drawn. However, for other people, this rationale is transformed into a complete and absolute hate for their neighbor or political leader, depending on whether or not they agree with all of their political beliefs. There are instances when it escalates into violence, resulting in the destruction of property, the theft of property, and the injury of individuals, despite the fact that the owners of the property have nothing to do with the anger that they feel over the political development. There are also some who engage in a nonviolent demonstration, which may occasionally devolve into screaming and calling names. Not every instance of protesting results in negative consequences; but, when it comes to certain parties, it does, to a certain extent, become quite violent! Mr. Donald Trump, the President In the history of the United States, no election year has ever been as intense as the one that occurred in 2016. In no way remotely near! In my whole life, I have never seen a non-political candidate emerge victorious in a national election. In the not too distant past, the majority of people believed that Donald Trump had a very little chance of winning the election, and some even believed that he had no chance at all. On the other hand, it was believed that he was the candidate who Hillary Clinton would have the least amount of difficulty defeating, and several Democrats voted for him in the primaries but did not vote for him in the general election! Aside from that, his candidacy was met with opposition not just from members of the Democratic establishment but also from candidates from the Republican establishment! Even some local conservative talk-show hosts around the country, one of whom is in my local community where I grew up, who would normally vote for the Republican establishment, told his listeners that he was voting for Hillary Clinton and that he wanted her to win. He was fairly confident that she would win because of what the mass media was publishing. He was a supporter of Hillary Clinton. On several occasions, he would tell his audience that Trump had absolutely no chance of winning the election! In the event that you were unaware of his identity, you may have thought that he was a pundit for CNN, MSNBC, or even Megyn Kelly appearing on Fox News! One of the leaders of the Republican establishment, Paul Ryan, who is admired by many Republicans as a so-called true conservative, distanced himself from Trump by not campaigning for him in Wisconsin and by not talking about Trump in general. Instead, he wanted to talk about the agenda of the Republican candidate for president. Later on, just before the election, Ryan said that the reason he did not campaign with Donald Trump was because he was not in Wisconsin at the time and he was fighting to maintain Republicans in control. He claimed that this was reason enough for him to not campaign with Trump. Otherwise, Ryan came to the conclusion that he would have. Therefore, why did he not make an attempt to be in Wisconsin at the same time, or at the very least, why did he not speak more positively about the agenda that Donald Trump has for making America great again when he was in other states? Ryan had a difficult time coming to terms with the possibility that he would have to back Donald Trump for president, and I have a sneaking suspicion that he wanted someone else to win the nomination for the Republican Party. Ryan was working on a wall to resist Hillary in the event that she was elected, and I have a sneaking suspicion that he was doing so because he believed that Trump was going to lose because he believed the same media that declared he had no chance of winning. There was opposition to Donald Trump coming from a variety of different directions, including information received from e-mails that were leaked from the Hillary Clinton campaign. These emails revealed that CNN had colluded with Hillary’s staff (for the debates) in their attempt to sabotage Trump’s bid for the presidency. You should ask yourself why the media would go to such tremendous pains to support a candidate who they reportedly believed had a very little chance of losing the election. I am of the opinion that the mainstream media, including CNN and the majority of other mainstream media outlets, did, in fact, feel that Trump had a better chance of winning than they wanted the public to believe! In order to assist Hillary, they had exaggerated the likelihood that Donald Trump would not be elected president. In addition to this, the leftist media went to tremendous pains to minimize and cover up the illegal acts in which Mrs. Clinton was engaged. One of these activities was the transmission of classified information to her personal server while she was serving as Secretary of State. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted an investigation into her not once, but twice. Despite the fact that a large number of emails were deleted on purpose, the FBI did not come to the conclusion that she should be punished due to a “intent” provision in the statute. Specifically, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said that she did not have any “intent” to use the secret material in an illegal manner! Would it be possible for the rest of us to do the same thing, provided that we do not utilize the classified information in an illegal manner? Not in my opinion! Under no circumstances is it permissible to send classified material to a person’s residence without first obtaining consent, regardless of who the person is. Rappers, pop singers, and Hollywood stars all came out to demonstrate their support for Hillary Clinton by bashing Donald Trump. The opposition did not stop there; they continued to do so. The Pope, along with other religious leaders, has voiced his opposition to Donald Trump and encouraged Catholics to abstain from voting for him due to the immigration problem. In every sense of the word, the election of Donald Trump was nothing short of a miraculous act from God, who is the master of everything. Despite the fact that God has put Donald Trump in a position of power, this does not necessarily indicate that he is a particularly moral person who is living a Christian life. It is just the opposite; I personally indicated that he was creating a circus out of the discussions due to his temperament, while also using aggressive language to defend himself and attack his opponents. However, throughout history, there have been instances of leaders who have been of this sort and have achieved great success while having a variety of shortcomings! Changes are on the horizon for the United States of America. President-Elect In comparison to Hillary Clinton, who spent 1.2 billion dollars on her campaign, Donald Trump, who is a CEO, paid out 66 million dollars for his campaign. This ought to demonstrate to you that the White House cannot be purchased with money! However, in order to make a genuine run for the presidency or any other post on a national level, such as Congress or the Senate, you will still be necessary to spend a significant amount of thousands of dollars. The United States of America is going to develop a more business-oriented framework as a result of the fact that Donald Trump is the current CEO. Trump is already making efforts to negotiate a deal that would result in a reduction in the price of the new F-35 fighter jet. This would be accomplished by favouring one defense contractor over another. In the event that Trump is unable to reach an agreement with Lockheed, it is likely that he will choose to terminate the purchase and instead have Super Hornets constructed at a lower cost. We have never seen anything like this before. Indeed, there have been instances in which companies have submitted bids for government contracts; but, they have never been obliged to adhere to a budgetary framework to the extent that they will be required to do so under the administration of Donald Trump! Jobs, jobs, and more jobs are going to be the primary priority of the government of Donald Trump. lowering the corporate tax rate, which is the highest in the world, as well as imposing a tax penalty on businesses that choose to manufacture their goods in a different nation, and rescinding trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NFTA). As opposed to Hillary’s energy plans, which are almost identical to those of the Obama administration, which encourages a greater reliance on OPEC and a reduction in output inside the United States, Hillary’s policies are different. There will be a completion of the fourth phase of the Keystone Pipeline. Consequently, this will result in an increased level of market saturation, which will keep oil prices at a low level. Additionally, this will eliminate costly modes of transportation such as trucks and trains, which pollute more than passing via a pipeline. Additionally, this will result in the creation of certain high-paying positions, mostly for union members. Despite the fact that oil prices are expected to stay low, the energy strategy of President Trump will have an impact on oil production and fracking. This is fantastic news for consumers. With the incoming administration of President Trump, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is likely to face significant challenges, mostly due to the amount of money it spends on defense. A significant portion of NATO’s military budget is funded by the United States, but this will change under the administration of President Trump, who has been particularly critical of NATO’s failure to spend sufficient sums on defense. The use of money from taxpayers to exert influence over policies in the Middle East will also undergo a transformation. OPEC nations, who are largely reliant on revenue from oil and gas, would suffer as a result of this, since the United States is working toward becoming more oil independent. As the price of oil continues to remain low, it will be fascinating to see how these nations deal with the situation. When was the last time you looked at your 401(k)? If you own one, you will note that it has increased quite a bit since the election, and Wall Street is attempting to break over the 20,000 barrier. The reason behind this is because Trump takes a pro-business attitude. The reduction of taxes and regulations, as well as the improvement of trade agreements that are more advantageous to the United States of America! To say that this is a small sample of what we might anticipate from the next government would be inadequate. Within the following four to maybe eight years, it will be fascinating to see how everything turns out from this point on. Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, the president, politics, the Trump administration, Clinton’s emails, and related articles are all included in this collection. This article should be sent to a friend! Subscribe to have articles like as this one sent directly to your inbox! Get a free subscription right now!
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com