Jonah Goldberg, a writer for the National Review, posed the question of what Hillary’s brand is in an article that was published in February of 2015. The question was posed because, similar to the women, Hillary’s brand has undergone such a significant transformation that it cannot be adequately traced without the assistance of an expert in high-speed atomic particle acceleration. In the end, Goldberg is forced to accept that there is no question that a large number of voters and commentators would gladly purchase anything they come up with for Clinton. On the other hand, some people will concentrate not on what is new in Hillary 5.0, but rather on what has remained the same in all of the previous versions: a mission that is defined by the quest of power. What would voters gladly purchase from the queen of pantsuits and prevarications? This is the question that has been enlarged to include this further inquiry. Beginning with Hillary’s book, “It takes a Village to Raise a Child…”, we have started to see that the truth has been employed in a limited capacity when advertising a business. This is something that we have noticed. Following the payment of one hundred twenty thousand dollars to Barbara Feinman, a journalism professor at Georgetown University, to ghostwrite her book, Ms. Feinman wasn’t given any credit for her work. There is a possibility that Hillary paid Feinman $120,000 to have tea with her and debate the merits of the proposal. Hillary insists that she drafted every phrase herself. The majority of people are still unaware of it, but even though it is celebrating its sixteenth anniversary, the book is still considered little more than mind candy for liberals and progressives who share Hillary’s worldview. For the rest of us, we continue to be convinced that when it comes to raising a kid, it is not necessary for a complete village but rather just two loving parents. It is quite similar to the list that can be seen on Hillary Clinton’s own website, which states that there are 112 reasons (and counting) why she should be our next president. It is definitely a list that was ghost authored (in Hillary’s thinking) by one person, and that person is Barack Obama; however, he will not get any acknowledgment for his work too. What is the amount of money that apathetic liberals who are loners would spend to have their liar make it into the White House? According to an article published by Politico in May of 2015, in order for Hillary to win the election, she would need to collect a clean $2 billion from the wealthy and upper-class liberal consumers. However, in August of 2016, AP.org stated that Hillary was barely a half billion dollars into the completion of her campaign. Hillary, who stated in It Takes a Village that “we are living in an interdependent world where what our children hear, see, feel, and learn will affect how they grow up and who they turn out to be,” is also in favor of all of the policies that pertain to gay and transgender people, including the indoctrination of underage children and the exposure of them to the homosexual and trans lifestyle. Therefore, her notion of a good thing is to educate kindergarten students in California schools about the concept of tranny choice and to use rainbow unicorns to introduce them to gay choices in other schools. According to Hillary, this is how she sees their future? This is the kind of mindset that, only a few short years ago, would have placed Hillary Clinton on the fast route to the jailhouse rather than the administration of the United States. Despite the fact that she has been accused of lying, being crooked, and holding harmful opinions toward the youth of our country, there are still millions of people in the United States who feel that she ought to be imprisoned. Additionally, she makes the following statement from the book It Takes a Village: “…standards are for: They determine what students should know, not how they are taught or assessed for.” It is what she symbolizes to the United States of America as – what children should know – that she encourages and coddles young people to explore sexual inclinations that drive them to the verge of sexual freakishness before they have even had their first sexual desires. The guidance that Hillary has provided about youngsters may be used to bring up yet another significant concern regarding the manner in which fully grown people need to interact with this candidate for president. The statement made by Hillary is that “children feel a feeling of security when they know what to anticipate next.” Specifically, it is this remark that causes shivers to run down and up the spine. The fact that she is ‘knowing’ what she will create next is the thing that should drive every genuine voter who still loves our country as far away from Ms. Clinton as they possibly can, and they should not go to the polls with her name in mind. The liberal ideology that Hillary Clinton espouses does not provide any sense of safety, particularly for those who are not guilty. In light of the fact that Christ issued a stern warning against misguiding or inflicting damage on children, I would not give a single dime or a mite to anything that bears Hillary’s name. “But whomever is going to cause offense to one of these young children who have faith in me, it would be better for him if a millstone were to be hung around his neck, and that he were to be drowned in the depths of the ocean.” (Matthew 18:6) Despite the fact that the sole goal that Planned Parenthood has ever stated is to kill families as well as unborn children, members of the pro-choice liberal movement continue to support the organization. When it comes to children, Hillary’s stance is comparable to child abuse that was premeditated. If she were to be elected to government, what kind of institution or agency would she establish? A projected child molestation and abuse office—is it necessary for the United States of America? When it comes to this election season, let’s finally put an end to the ludicrous term that was coined by liberals and others who choose to remain apathetic. It is nothing short of ludicrous to think that any of the contenders would be a poor option. The very act of claiming that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are both equally repugnant is repugnant in and of itself. In contrast to Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton is obsessed with power. It is possible that he is more similar to the Big Bopper than Ronald Reagan, but if you take a closer look, you will see that he is quite different from Hillary Clinton in every manner. As a native American who was raised in the United States, he was not raised in a liberal la-la land, and his goal is to preserve our nation rather than destroy it. Since 2005, Michael Bresciani has served as the editor of the website American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter.
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com