On December 7, 2015, the Pasadena Star published a title that was typical of such headlines. The headline stated, “We will win – Obama pledges to crush Isis, asks for stronger gun regulation.” Mr. Obama’s response to the mass shootings in San Bernardino was less than anyone could have hoped for; however, while we will never become accustomed to radical Muslim attacks on Americans, we will also never become accustomed to the Muslim mitigating President who continues to assert that the slaughter of Americans, French, and other people all over the world is being carried out by a small number of radical and misguided Muslims in our world. Pabulum is this ancient rap that is not even close to being accurate to the present situation. Following that, there is the “gun control” rap. Let’s get down to earth and talk about truth rather than hyperbole. Guns jam sometimes, but they are not caused by profound and hidden disorders, and they are not religious. However, individuals often lose control of their firearms. Has the President of the United States and the liberals of our country failed to attend their lessons in social science and psychology 101? Will we have to pay the price for their unwillingness to come into the real world as we perish like sheep that have been brought to the slaughter, while they continue to live in their cloisters and cliques, surrounded by walls of denial and verbal obfuscation that are as thin as paper? It is inexcusable that decent warriors continue to lose their lives in locations like as Benghazi, ranchers, and members of the United States Border Patrol along the banks of the Rio Grande, while service members in uniform are being killed in their own military sites here in the United States. We listen to bluster and outrageous ideas from the new global society that is based on the slogan “Don’t worry, be happy.” Is this the society in which nationalism and pride in one’s country have finally been brought to an end? After that, we hear from Attorney General Loretta Lynch that she would bring legal fire and brimstone down on anybody who talks against the middle of the road lot of Muslims who we are supposed to call the “moderates.” Should we consider this to be “prevailing?” Presented here is naiveté in all of its oblivious beauty, like a lot of shimmering tinsel on an old and dry Christmas tree that is going to be thrown away. It is true that Lynch will likewise get her pink slip when Obama’s term comes to an end. This does not constitute naiveté; rather, it is a given. Donald Trump, a prominent presidential contender who is also the front-runner, is the next person to speak publicly about the massacre that occurred in San Bernardino. It was to be expected that he would shake up the political constabulary with a proposal that was not only brash but also entirely understandable. He proposed that the country should not allow any more Muslims to enter the country until the issue of terrorism within the country is brought under control. Despite the fact that this writer is a devoted admirer of Ted Cruz, I am able to see the logic in the proposition that Trump has made. Trump is aware that the United States of America continues to welcome newcomers into the country; however, as the majority of Americans, we are only interested in bringing in people who respect who we are and are excited to arrive in a country where freedom and opportunity are regarded as positive qualities. This is not prejudice or ignorance; rather, it is brilliance wrapped in common sense and the desire for a peaceful life. If you dislike the west, make your home in the east. It’s possible that Trump will win me over! As a last point of comparison, while looking at headlines, there is one that is more important, forceful, and germane than all of the rest together, and it comes from Breitbart. It is an essay written by Pamela Geller with the headline “If Loretta Lynch Wants to Ban ‘Violent Talk,’ She Should Ban the Quran.” For years, Gellar has been making an appeal to the truth by attempting to convince the American public that the issue is not that some Muslims are radical, while the vast majority of Muslims are moderate; rather, the source of their inspiration or learning is the culprit. Gellar has been doing this by trying to engage the American public. It is very clear that the Quran and the Hadith include several teachings that advocate for the use of violence against anybody who does not submit to Islam. According to Gellar, all that is required of us is to get familiar with these two sources in order to uncover these straightforward yet self-evident realities. A brief inspection will reveal that she is accurate. This is something that can be discovered. In order to accommodate those who are reluctant or too sluggish to seek for themselves, she provides a large number of quotations from various sources. It is possible that the only thing that differentiates the radical Muslim from the moderate Muslim is the moment when they wake up and make the decision to take these verses more seriously and act on them according to them. Jihad is inherent to the source, and all that is required to bring about its lethal outcome is a simple act of devotion of the individual. When people relieve themselves of any true connection to the true and living God and connect to the meanderings of one who emerged from a cave in Medina that was lined with mold and bats with a vision that even he doubted, spiritual discernment is dissolved in an instant. This is something that we must keep in mind while we are working to promote inclusion, tolerance, and the positive notion that Islam is one of the world’s great religions. When it comes to matters of religion, those who we elect to positions of authority sometimes enter with the level of perception of a kid. It would be the same of expecting a child of three years old to drive the school bus and ensure that all of the pupils get home safely. This is the liberalism that exists in the United States today: do you feel comfortable with a child of three years old operating our bus? It has been said by Mr. Obama that we cling to our Bibles when we are confused or upset. However, our Bibles do not contain any confusion at all, and they are, in fact, what will prevent us from being harmed if we take the message seriously. By becoming Muslim, the United States of America has not been able to come this far, totally protected and powerful. Instead of another religion, regardless of how ancient or new it may be, the message of the Bible is that the world needs a Savior. This is the central message of the Bible. In addition, our bibles teach us the distinction between heresies, cults, false prophets, and popular conceptions of what a great religion ought to be like. We are shown in our Bibles a Savior who, rather than choosing which women to add to the harem or which kingdoms to conquer, chose to give his life in order to save us. It was because he did not desire power, fame, or riches that God was so pleased with him. As a result, God has the intention of bestowing all three of these things onto him in the end. “And the seventh angel sounded; and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever,” God said in the Bible. Revelation 11:15 Indeed, Mr. Obama, It was a dreadful day for all Americans who asked you to safeguard the Constitution and those for whom it was written against any and all adversaries, whether they were domestic or foreign. San Bernardino was not simply a bad day for the intelligence community; it was a bad day for all Americans. The use of your rap is not a suitable replacement for using the complete authority that was entrusted to you in order to save individuals like us. We are not left with a legacy if we are instructed to calmly take a pounding while the world, with any luck, becomes gentler with each passing day. We have referred to our former presidents as founders, fathers, statesmen, defenders, and guardians; yet, even in a society that is more liberal than it has ever been, it is quite unlikely that we would embrace the concept of having a “Rapper in Chief.” Since the year 2005, Michael Bresciani has been serving as the publisher of American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter.
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com