India and China have reached an agreement to break the impasse between their forces in the disputed border area of Ladakh, Kashmir, according to a story that was published in the New York Times on Saturday, September 26, 2014. Sushma Swaraj, the Indian Minister of Foreign Affairs, made this statement on Friday, after a meeting with her Chinese colleague in New York to discuss the matter. The region of Ladakh was occupied by Chinese soldiers, and the specifics of the agreement about the Chinese exit are unclear. The BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) Bank in Shanghai has appointed an Indian to the position of chief executive officer. In addition to being significant members of the BRICS, India and China are also significant trading partners in the current area. As an additional point of interest, China and Russia are big proponents of India’s inclusion as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, although the United States has shown hostility to such a proposition. The statement that was given by the Chinese Spokesperson of the Foreign Office about India’s significant participation on the Silk Road was released the previous week. In light of the fact that India has been in total violation of the United Nations resolutions on Kashmir for the last six decades, the majority of Pakistanis are appalled by a statement made by the Chinese government that was made unilaterally. Despite the fact that India is crossing the line of control in the Kashmir valley and that Indian forces are continuously murdering Pakistanis on border land, the foreign office in Islamabad has remained silent in response to China’s remark that is supportive of India for its actions. There have been demonstrations today in London and New York by Pakistanis in response to the Indian government’s abuses of Kashmir. There is a greater necessity than ever before for the Pakistani foreign office to provide a response to China’s favorable opinion of India. In addition to this, Pakistan had already surrendered some portions of Kashmir to China. CONCLUSION: Both the strategic importance of the region and the fear that it will fall into the hands of the United States with a United States Air Force base in Skardu, in the event that a future Pakistani government strikes a deal with the United States to oversee the region, are extremely clear indications of China’s interest in Kashmir, Gilgit, and Baltistan. China’s interest in these regions is very clear, whether it be the control of the precious stones and cooper mines of GB, which are worth more than one trillion dollars. The United States of America, Japan, and the Gulf Cooperation Council will get enormous investments if a future administration with my participation takes such a move. The Chinese, Indian, and Iranian interests in the area are all negatively impacted as a result of this. This is a significant obstacle that must be overcome in order to resolve the status of Kashmir. It is not only India that wants to maintain the status quo about Kashmir; rather, it is China. However, it is imperative that it be made abundantly clear that wars are not a solution, and that a side to a dispute will never emerge victorious in a war. If I were the Prime Minister of Pakistan, I would carry out a covert operation in Kashmir and Khalistan on a far larger scale than what the RAW carried out in the region that was once known as East Pakistan. This would be done with the intention of gaining control of Kashmir. In order to achieve independence for Kashmir and Khalistan, this is the ONE and ONLY choice. In the event if a future administration led by me were to establish a United States base in Skardu, which would ensure Pakistan’s border security, China would not have the courage to meddle from the outside. Aside from that, a base in the United States will bring in funds worth at least one hundred billion dollars to satisfy Pakistan’s debt, and it will also facilitate the construction of thermal power projects in Pakistan via the Global Bank. In addition, as a result of China’s exit from Pakistan, investment in Pakistan by Japanese enterprises and interests will lead to an improvement in the country’s economic situation. Please take note that the author has previously served as an advisor to Chief Minister Sindh. Currently, the author holds the position of Central Leader for the Republican Party of the United States of America as well as Central Leader for the Arms Control Association USA organization.

I love myBlogd

Leave a Reply

Author

jackemails@gmail.com

Related Posts

THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR A DSC FOR THE SUBMISSION OF GSTR-3B DURING THE LOCKOUT, ACCORDING TO THE LATEST COVID-19 UPDATE!

Today, the whole globe is on the verge of being engulfed in a major catastrophe known as the COVID-19 epidemic. India has...

Read out all

COVID-19: FOUR WAYS TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE IN CHALLENGING TIMES COVID-19: FOUR WAYS TO DO BOTH

The frail economy of the whole world has been crippled by the epidemic caused by the COVID 19 virus. The first economic...

Read out all

THE COVID-19 AND OUR FINANCIAL SITUATION: MANAGING OUR MONEY AND MAINTAINING OUR STANDING

In the best of circumstances, money can be a difficult client to deal with. It’s possible that we won’t be able to...

Read out all

COVID-19 AND OUR MONEY: ENGAGING IN A STRUGGLE WITH OUR EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL HEALTH

Both governments and people all around the globe are facing the same issues, which are centered on the question of how to...

Read out all

REPORT NUMBER 15 THE MIRROR REARVIEW EXPLANATION

Stephen P. Bye, a reporter for the Mirror Rearview, is the subject of Article 15 of the Special Report. Stephen P. Bye,...

Read out all

WHAT TO DO ABOUT VULNERABILITIES IN CYBERSECURITY AND COVID-19 CYBERSECURITY AND COVID-19: VULNERABILITY

The Vulnerability of Cybersecurity and the Covid-19 Virus and What Can Be Done About It In the year 2020, Steve Burgess When...

Read out all

All rights reserved. ® myBlogd.com