- 0
- 1,702 word
The Jackal is a cat that belongs to the family of dogs known as Canis aureus. It is a medium-sized canine that is a voracious eater and is capable of consuming almost anything without hesitation. There is a term for those individuals who refer to themselves as the Jackals that can be found in the “Fallout: New Vegas Official Game Guide” to one of the most sophisticated video games currently available. It seems as if a page has been ripped out of the moral picture that exists in the United States of America, which was once a wonderful nation. To wit: “The Jackals are nothing more than a small group of recalcitrant individuals who are covered with scars and tattoos, and they make a livelihood by preying on everything that is weaker than they are.” It is possible to apply this term to the abortion business without causing any harm to the English language and without causing any undue harm to the individuals to whom it pertains or belongs. In 2010, Mike Godwin was one of the people who contributed to the creation of the concept that is now known as “Godwin’s Law.” This law states that every conversation about anything contentious will ultimately, if given enough time, wind up being linked to something that Hitler or the Nazis had done. Things are considered to be in the “morality of jackals” category when they go beyond the atrocities committed by the Nazis. This is the case when things go beyond what the Nazis have done. “These videos are actually giving us a glimpse into the abortion world and the callous treatment for profit motive they have on committing abortions, but then making as much money from the victims of abortion that they can, which is something even the Nazis didn’t think of,” said Jill Stanek, a former nurse and current chairwoman for the Susan B. Anthony List. Stanek was speaking about the recent videos (5) in which it is seen Agents of Planned Parenthood negotiating the price of organs derived from crushed and, in some cases harvested from completely whole babies for sale. Stanek is a member of the organization Susan B. Anthony List. For more than four decades, we have concealed these revelations by concealing them under the well-known statement “It’s the law of the country.” Despite the fact that it has become a paper thin cloak for the most abhorrent activity on the globe, which is known as abortion, it is, in any other name, deceit, foolish claptrap, and profound immorality. We believe that we are absolved of responsibility since it was nine judges or hundreds of elected officials who took the choice to destroy human lives in the name of hedonism; nonetheless, we are all implicated in the act. The question is, who precisely will be called to give an account on the last day, and who exactly chose these representatives and who selected these judges? If you feel that the inquiry is too wide for your standard of reasonableness, then at the very least, you could inquire as to who voted to retain Planned Parenthood receiving large sums of money from taxpayers to fund their activities. On Monday, August 3, 2015, the effort to withhold funding from Planned Parenthood was defeated by a vote of 53 to 46. Although Democrats made up the biggest group of people who voted yes, two Republicans also showed their support for the motion. In an article titled “Here are the Senators with the Blood of the Innocent on Their Hands” that was published on Bradlee Dean’s Sons of Liberty website, you will find the whole list of names. This information is provided by Tim Brown, who is the creator of the Freedom Outpost website. Could we conceal ourselves by using the names on that list? It is not possible for us to conceal ourselves behind these labels any more than it is for abortionists and those who support them to address the extensive list of issues that they have avoided or ignored for almost an entire generation. Questions such as: • What would the person who receives organs from a donor be thinking on the day that they learn that a newborn was killed in order to offer them a shot at life? • In the history of humanity, other than in our own heartless age, when has the phrase “rights of women” been used as an argument to justify the loss of the rights of another individual person? When was the last time that pregnancy was referred to as a “health concern” anyplace else but in our modern-day America, which is characterized by self-centeredness, hedonism, and a lack of morality? Doesn’t the practice of abortion contradict the notion that all men are created equal, and what exactly is the likelihood that an unborn child will be able to pursue life and liberty? Is it, at the at least, lacking in American values, if not immoral? • If a woman’s unborn kid is considered to be a part of her body, then it begs the question: why do we permit the sale of the bodily parts of that woman? • To what extent can the decision that is often referred to as Roe v. Wade be compared to any other rule of God, whether it be biblical or moral, or any other system of ethics in our whole world? Is there anything that the “law” can render moral? • Is it not possible that the so-called “war on women” is, in fact, a disguised allusion to the struggle against anything wicked in relation to abortion? Rather than focusing on women, isn’t it more about life and death? • There is no such thing as a person being born as a chattel, property, or slave. Parents do not ‘own’ their children, as shown by the fact that children cannot be bequeathed to anybody. Why, therefore, does the person who advocates for abortion feel that they have the right to life and death over something that they have never possess? One could only own slaves, and their owners had the right to murder them without fear of repercussions. Is a kid considered to be the mother’s captive? In almost every state in the United States, a person is considered to be legally and clinically dead when there is no longer any evidence of brain waves having been present. Why are we use the term “health care” to justify the murdering of infants whose brainwaves are actively functioning and who are in excellent health? To what extent does the concept of “proximity” contribute to or ameliorate the act of murder? Should it be considered less of a murder if someone chooses to kill you in Kentucky, or if you are slain in Tennessee, which is nearby? Isn’t it incredible that if a kid is taken from the womb by a few inches, it is considered murder, but if it is removed by a few inches earlier, it is considered a legal abortion? While I was reading the great prophetic book of Revelation, I came across a sentence that left me speechless. It was around forty years ago. In my opinion, it looked out of character with a significant portion of Christ’s teaching, which was mostly about love and charity, since it spoke to some individuals in the most derogatory ways possible. In particular, the use of the term “dogs” in the King James Version of the Bible as well as in other major editions of the Bible was something that I found difficult to fathom. I have now arrived to the realization that it is not in any way extravagant or excessive, and this realization came almost a generation after me. Within the context of the modern world, it is a clear and concise way to define those that possess the mindset of jackals. Additionally, it offers the assurance that they will not play any role in the eventual salvation of humanity. When he was asked about the people who would one day be granted access to the Holy City and the right to the Tree of Life, he stated that there would be some individuals who would not be permitted to enter. He did not mince words when describing the characteristics of those who would be denied entry. To provide an example, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” Whoever obeys his commands will be blessed, because they will be granted access to the tree of life and will be able to enter the city via the gates. Dogs, sorcerers, whoremongers, murderers, idolaters, and everyone who loves and lies are all included in the category of those who should not be found without. [Revelation 22:13-15] I have been considering this paragraph for half a lifetime, and I can now state that I have a complete understanding of why the dogs of this world who do not let humans to join their world will not be permitted to enter the next generation. We are not speaking in the language of extremism; rather, we are speaking in the language of justice. It is true that abortionists now possess the keys to the gateway or the entry into our world; but, they will eventually come face to face with the one who is in possession of the keys to heaven and hell itself. “I am he who lives and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and I have the keys of hell and of death,” the Bible says. Revelation 1:18 Since the year 2005, Michael Bresciani has been serving as the publisher of American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter.
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com