MAN FILES A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE BBC FOR COVERING UP SISTER’S MURDER ON 911

In a recent article that was published in alternative news, it was reported that Matt Campbell, who works at West Sussex England, is suing the BBC for allegedly covering up the death of his brother in a television show that was aired on 911. According to Matt, the broadcast is in violation of anti-terrorist laws in the United Kingdom. That there was an intentional withholding and cover up of critical undeniable evidence related with the murder of his brother and others in the North tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, which made the BBC complicit in the crime. … – Is it possible that the BBC may be suspected of providing assistance to terrorists and acts of terrorism? Matt will challenge the official account of the events of September 11, 2001, which states that they were allegedly carried out by terrorists affiliated with Al Qaeda hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings. Through careful examination of the evidence over the course of several years, Matt will be armed with a formidable attorney who will call expert witnesses and reference those who have been out of court in a variety of fields of expertise. With the help of witnesses who have expertise in fields such as physics, demolition, architecture, engineering, and other sciences, as well as the evidence that they have gathered from their investigations, Matt will attempt to convince the jury that the twin towers and WTC7 (the World Trade Center building 7 that was not hit by a plane) were all brought down as a result of controlled demolition, with one of the demolitions being the one that led to the death of his brother. To this end, Matt contends that the BBC had prior knowledge of the manner in which the buildings were brought down via the use of controlled explosives and demolition prior to the production of the broadcast. The fact that this information was not included in the television broadcast gives the terrorists who are the true perpetrators the opportunity to get away with their crimes, which in turn makes the BBC complicit. This is not a complete list, but the following are some of the charges that have been backed up by supporting evidence to show that the towers were brought down by deliberate demolition: 1. The World Trade Center buildings collapsed in a symmetrical free fall. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has provided evidence that suggests that at least eight stories of the World Trade Center (WTC) building collapsed with free-fall acceleration having no resistance from the internal structures (steel beams, columns, and horizontals criss-crosses) having been severed within a fraction of a second. This suggests that the collapse was the result of a carefully planned controlled explosive demolition. 2. Was the BBC aware of the imminent collapse of World Trade Center 7 on that particular day? During the events of September 11, 2001, the twin towers were the only high-rise buildings that had ever entirely fallen due to the impact of an aircraft or fire, indicating that they were removed in a controlled manner. A BBC live reporter reported the collapse of the World Trade Center 7 about twenty minutes before it really took place, which was around seven hours after the two buildings collapsed. None of the building’s components were damaged, and there was no sign of a fire. Did the BBC have any idea that the building was about to collapse, and that the reporter had accidentally blurted out the statement too soon? How come the BBC did not investigate this matter? 3. Did the BBC have a role in spreading incorrect information? In spite of the fact that there are numerous specialists in the fields of physics, demolition, architecture, engineering, and other sciences… then there are witnesses such as first responder firemen who claimed that they heard a series of explosions one after the other, suggesting that the demolition was controlled, the BBC chose to ignore all of this information. Then, after the program was shown, they refused to be corrected by data from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that confirmed the occurrence of free-fall after the collapse of World Trade Center 7… 4. Arguments that the account was not presented in a fair and impartial manner on purpose In lieu of responding to the demands of a large number of individuals who were requesting that the BBC report the findings of the aforementioned witnesses and mentioned experts who claimed that demolition was taking place, the BBC has instead disseminated information that is discreditable without providing any real explanation as to why they consider them to be incorrect, thereby engaging in smear campaigns. This is a violation of the editorial rules that the BBC has established in order to ensure impartial broadcasting… Over the course of the next legal proceeding, Matt and his team will be addressing a number of problems, including those listed above. For further articles, blogs, and videos that are linked to this one, as well as a free PDF download entitled “The Greater Way and the New Paradigm Experience,” visit the website http://www.NewParadigm.ws. If you enjoyed reading this article, I highly recommend that you do so. Paul A. Philips serve as the host. Please visit the following website for the link: http://www.newparadigm.ws/

I love myBlogd

pixie_dust

See author's posts