Towards the end of the 1980s, I had just returned from the prestigious King’s College London, where I had worked with Dr. Jack Botting and my external examiner professor, Dr. Sir John Vane, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1982. I had been asked to teach pharmacology at Karachi University in response to their request. In the course of (vivo) animal research, I was astounded to see a colleague doing experiments on animals without the participation of carbon dioxide. In terms of research methodologies, they were completely unaware of what the acronym IRB stands for, and they were also unaware of the protocols that are used in research investigations. Afterwards, I came across a different colleague who worked on antibiotics of the first generation, utilizing references that were forty years old and placing fictional figures on the trial chart. A candidate participating in a PhD program in the United States may be kicked out of the program if they are found to have engaged in such a practice in research methodologies. In addition, a buddy who was recently honored with a presidential award was found to be guilty of plagiarism by exploiting the study materials of his own student. A brigadier in the military who is a friend of mine and who admires a guy who holds a prominent governmental job for his commitment to higher education in Pakistan was requested to show proof to back up the assertion that he was appreciating the man. With all due respect, I must say that the whimsical comment was not supported by any evidence. During the time that I served as the general secretary of the Karachi Institution Students Union from 1976 to 1978, I was approached on many occasions with the request to have the late Dr. Saleemuz Zaman Siddiqui become the vice chancellor of the university. Because he was concerned about losing his dedication to academic and scientific endeavors, he would never accept a permanent administrative post of vice chancellor. The majority of scientists and researchers would not compromise their research activities by choosing administration posts in the United States. On the other hand, all of the so-called scientists in Pakistan are striving to gain administrative positions out of a desire for power. This is a checklist that should be used in order to comprehend the full conversation: 1. How many Pakistani individuals who have earned a doctoral degree are eligible to occupy academic posts in the United States of America with Pakistani education? Secondly, how do educational assessors in the United States rate degrees from Pakistan? 3. Does a judge from Pakistan have the educational qualifications necessary to practice law in the United States? If not, what are the reasons for this? 4. Is it possible for a Pakistani professor of medicine who also has a Pakistani FPPS to work in the United States or the United Kingdom? 5.Is it possible for a Pakistani cadet who has completed the ISB to fulfill the educational requirements necessary to enroll in the officer candidate school of the United States military? It is a reality that has to be addressed in order to enhance the educational standards in Pakistan, and these are just a few of the fascinating issues that need to be asked. Despite the fact that it is a painful truth, it is a reality. what is true Three percent of the population in the United States possesses a doctoral degree, according to the United States Census (http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php, 2015). On the other hand, a Pakistani report on Pakistan states that only 0.00004 percent of the population in Pakistan possesses a doctoral degree (http://www.thenews.com.pk/todays-news-6-136296-total-number-of-phds-reaches-8142-in-pakistan, 2012). The United States of America is rated first with 8,626,193 research publications, India is ranked ninth with 998,544 publications, Saudi Arabia is ranked forty-fourth with 91,460 publications, and Pakistan is ranked forty-sixth with 81,612 research papers each year. Despite the fact that the Pakistani diaspora ranks among the top 10 percent of students in education throughout the United States, Pakistan as a country continues to fall behind. What is the reason for this disparity on the national level? The reason for this is that the capacity for Pakistani young to develop or achieve in education is very much there; however, the medium that assists the youth in developing in the current chaos is the missing part. Despite the fact that the overseas Pakistani diaspora accounts for only five million of Pakistan’s total population of 186 million, this relatively small population is responsible for almost half of the country’s budget. Meanwhile, Pakistani political thugs continue to engage in activities such as money laundering, multiple marriages, and excessive drinking habits. In the process of constructing a naya Pakistan comprised of burger youngsters, this has caused the very character of the new generation to be harmed, and they are doomed to remain away from Iqbal and Jinnah’s Pakistan. Resolution: In order to save Pakistan, there is an urgent need for a new leadership that can prevent cultural damage.
I love myBlogd
