Since I was a teenager, I devoured, admired, and revered every issue of Scientific American magazine. In most cases, they do more research than would be expected of a typical trained researcher. Today, things took a different turn. They prepared an article on kratom that was intended to provide the impression of objectivity and offer arguments for all sides of the debate. However, similar to other criminals who “truly want to be caught,” they have left a lot of hints that point to the fact that they are on the side of stigmatizing kratom. How am I to know this? This author provided a large number of hints. And why does it matter to me that Kratom only publishes stories that are objective and free of political bias? because I’ve studied the study as well, and I’m aware that it’s just as dangerous as its close relative, coffee (actually a bit less so; people get very addicted to coffee, and have actually died from it). There have been no documented cases of kratom-related fatalities or even overdoses. But instead of the forty-eight states that have kept kratom legal due to sanity reasons (knowing that it is a safe plant with research showing it is good for the heart, lowers blood pressure, boosts the immune system, and works better than st. john’s wort on anxiety and depression while also being harmless), the federal government has decided to make kratom illegal. On the other hand, Scientific American makes no reference to such states. They only include Indiana since they are the only state that “has explicitly prohibited it.” wooooooooo. It is astounding that journalists in the United States of America, of all people, have not learnt their lesson and are helping to ensure that the United States will be condemned to repeat history. This was the identical method that was used to stigmatize marijuana. In the opening line of their article, they drop a hint by stating all of the nations in which it is outlawed owing to the “psychoactive qualities” it has. Instead of using opiate medicines, which any doctor would be happy to give, I turn to kratom when I need relief from persistent and severe pain. I make sure to take the right quantity. There are no psychoactive effects, thus there is no euphoria, and there are no hallucinations (all of which could occur on occasion with actual opiate drugs). The author then reveals his major deception to the reader. According to him, the DEA has categorized kratom as a “drug of concern.” Because of a number of factors, this statement could not be farther from the truth. Similar to the plant known as St. John’s Wort, kratom is classified as a herb. It is not a narcotic, and the DEA is aware of this fact; despite this, they categorize it as a “substance of concern,” along with thousands of other plants. Remember that marijuana is also included on the list. And keeping people who needed marijuana for over a century by a bigoted drug czar in the 1930’s did so to make a name for himself, that mexican men were bringing “locoweed” into america, introducing it to our women, and kidnapping and raping them, never to be seen again; this was all done to make a name for himself. Within the span of a single month, marijuana was placed in the same category as heroin and cocaine as a schedule 1 substance. Millions of people have been harmed because doctors, without even caring about the science that the government already had, that marijuana was not only safe but protected the brain, and the United States government even got a patent on marijuana for that very reason, as we learned on dr. sanja gupta’s “weed” on cnn. Dr. Sanja Gupta’s “weed” is a program that airs on CNN. If you don’t believe me, try searching “usa govt patent on marijuana” on Google. It still has it, and you can even find information on why the government had it and the patent number on the website of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), despite demonizing it, lying about it, and other things to the general public. I am curious as to how they feel that decision turned out for them. Despite the fact that researchers in Thailand are investigating kratom for its potential to help meth users quit the addiction, it fails to draw the parallel that kudzu, a plant that grows wild in the United States (and southeast Asia), has previously been shown to help alcoholics quit drinking. Does this mean that kudzu is harmful to humans? Tea made from kudzu is often consumed by humans. No widespread addiction or fatalities due to it have been reported to me. However, the author either is unaware of this fact or deliberately chooses to ignore it in their work. He also emphasizes the fact that kratom was made illegal in Thailand seven decades ago, but he does not elaborate on the reason for this. Does he not have any idea? Does he not realize that it was very cheap, highly accessible (it grows on trees all over the place), and that it was interfering with their legitimate opium trade? Now that they have come to terms with the fact that what they did may have been a little bit immoral, they are rethinking it, very similarly to how the United States is rethinking its stance on marijuana. Once again, I couldn’t find any reference to it in Scientific American. Additionally, research is being done on it, and there is some evidence to suggest that it may assist in curing diabetes type 2. scientific American made no mention of it at all. In his talk, he talks about how he “became interested in kratom.” After having conversations with a few academics, he became aware of a kratom misuse case that was being handled at the Massachusetts General Hospital. A guy who suffered from thoracic outlet syndrome had been dependent on strong opiates for a number of years. Because his wife insisted that he cease, he researched kratom and placed an order for it. The next thing he knew, he had combined it with modafinil, a stimulant that was permitted by the Food and Drug Administration, and he was suffering a seizure and was in the emergency department. misuse of kratom? I beg your pardon, but I’ve heard of folks who have mixed modafinil and water and then gone to the emergency department as a result of the horrible side effects. Once, I was given it, and over the next two days, I had suicidal thoughts. I never have the urge to end my life. That was before I had any knowledge about kratom at all. However, in the eyes of the author of the article published in Scientific American, this was obviously a case of kratom misuse. there is not enough evidence to suggest that this individual was or is on a mission with a specific goal. However, there is more to come. Then he continues by saying that the patient was spending an annual total of $15,000 on kratom. What a shocking revelation, considering that he had been abusing oxycodone, hydrocodone, and a variety of other potent opioids for many years. This individual was a drug addict. I am not addicted to kratom. He was able to kick his fatal opium addiction thanks to kratom, which ultimately saved his life. The only explanation for his peculiar experiences is that he used it in conjunction with a psychoactive substance whose risks are well known (and can be deadly). There is no way kratom could be lethal. as it is not the case. Please let me know if someone has passed away as a result of consuming just pure kratom leaf, since this would be the first report ever of us knowing anything about kratom in modern history, which spans around one thousand years of thai and southeast Asian history. After all of these journalistic gaffes, you’d think the author would realize that he was being investigated by the publication. Not at all. He makes the decision to go to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH), which continues to advocate for marijuana to be classified as a schedule one, potentially lethal drug along the lines of heroin and cocaine. The NIH has never in its history done anything to help research on medicinal herbs that might heal, unless it is to find something negative. He hopes that they will change their minds. And since they believe kratom to be an addictive substance, they do not provide funding for research on the substance (whatever that means). Dr. Gupta’s segment on CNN’s “Weed” taught us another important lesson: the United States federal government will not fund research on therapeutic plants unless the results are expected to be unfavorable. Additionally, we found out that the Israeli medical community, which is often regarded as being among the greatest in the world, does, in fact, provide financial support for research into the positive effects that medicinal plants may have. And because of their contributions, researchers have shown that cannabis may help treat Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease; as a result, assisted living facilities and nursing homes now provide the drug without restriction to patients who might benefit from it. … it works when medications don’t even come close to doing what they’re supposed to. If we enable government agencies in the United States to research kratom, the plant will never be given a “fair shake,” since our agencies are not designed to function in such a manner. We are able to get knowledge from the many research that have been conducted on this topic by academics at institutions in Thailand and other countries in Southeast Asia. These research suggest that responsible use of kratom leads in a very low risk of adverse effects. The outcomes of these investigations have been highly positive. We will need to locate private, neutral, non-corporate, and non-governmental studies just like the majority of the ones that found marijuana to not only be safe but also extremely healthy if we ever want accurate American studies that reflect the true plant kratom. These studies, like the majority of the ones that found marijuana to not only be safe but also extremely healthy. We can expect blatant demonization reports on kratom up until that time (and probably past that time), as well as more subtle demonization like this one by larry grenemeier, who may or may not have known he was merely a puppet in the further demonization of kratom. Until that time, we can expect blatant demonization reports on kratom. In either scenario, he will not be remembered as a pioneering journalistic hero when the truth about the safety of kratom is revealed. This is the same fate that befell the pioneering journalists of the 1930s who did everything in their power to inform the public about the safety of marijuana, frequently putting their lives and careers in jeopardy in the process. By sharing my experience, there is nothing for me to gain and nothing for me to lose. But if I’m forced to go back to opiates for my severe pain, I will die. If just one person is able to stop taking lethal prescribed opiate drugs because something they read encouraged them to try a more natural path, then I can go to my grave knowing that I did something right. If just one person is able to stop taking these drugs, then I can go to my grave knowing that I did something right. I am aware of it. Kratom really has the opposite effect. Therefore, am I just some average Joe Schmo who hangs around and drinks kratom tea? I am not interested in purchasing a kratom supplier or distributorship of any kind. I just want to make sure that the real story gets out to at least a few people, amidst the thousands of kratom demonization reports, such as the one in scientific american which disguises itself as “fair and balanced” by telling that there are a few good things about kratom, such as the possibility that it could wean meth addicts off of meth, etc. I just want to make sure that the real story gets out to at least a few people. I’m sorry, but if any serious investigation was done, I just don’t buy it, and the author probably didn’t want the complete story disclosed either. Before you start calling me wrong, I encourage everyone to think back to the stories that happened in the 1930s, when our government was trying to get doctors, scientists, and other people on board to demonize marijuana, even though they knew it was, in fact, quite a healthy herb that could save lives and relieve unimaginable pain. Before you start calling me wrong, I encourage everyone to think back to those stories. I really hope the author is aware that he is contributing to the same kind of agenda, and that he is unfortunately going to be remembered as being on the wrong side of history. And it pains me to see one of my favorite magazines, Scientific American, join the ranks of those who have been on the losing side of history. It makes me feel a lot of sadness to watch it. I am the kind of person that consumes anything from two to eight grams of kratom on a daily basis, depending on how severe the pain is. I still drink 1.5 cups of coffee every day, just as I did on the first day I drank it when I was in my teens (I’m 59 now). The threshold is the same as it was on the first day I took it, therefore I’m not addicted to it any more than I am to coffee. Because of the excruciating agony caused by neuralgia, I used to be unable to move from my bed. Now, roughly once a week, my wife and I go on a mountain trek that is between 10 and 15 miles long. I have a deep appreciation for and desire to discover nature. I used to have partial dentures, but now I don’t need them since it doesn’t cause me any discomfort at all to chew food with the tiny places where my gums are exposed. It used to be completely intolerable. Did I simply sit here and watch the walls slide away? Not at all. I went back to school (it was an excellent institution) and majored in business technology. I started up six different companies (in my 50s). I just got married, and both my new bride and I are head over heels for one another. We are the caretakers of the national park, which is next to where we make our home. We give our time to helping others in the community. We develop and manufacture our own unique range of goods (over 200,000 items in all of our trademark). Before being exposed to kratom, none of those things were even imaginable. I had to stop doing it multiple times since I eventually ran out and needed to purchase more. Was there any pain involved? I get what you mean. the same as when I don’t have any coffee left. Did it seem like I was about to pass away? without a doubt. the same thing would happen if I ran out of coffee… To put it another way, the answer is “yes” in jest. It’s not as bad as when you run out of coffee, that’s for sure. my suggestion. Do not take kratom for recreational purposes; I say this not because it is harmful, but because you are likely to be very let down by the effects of doing so (if they are used to drugs or marijuana). At the quantities I’m taking, I don’t get any euphoria at all. I would suppose that there is some quantity that one may take in order to see visions, but it is not something I am interested in doing, and I would guess that it would be extremely costly. However, the same is true if you sniff lysol, which is something that my friends and I did when we were teenagers. Therefore, I guess lysol should also be on that DEA “substance of concern” list, as should the majority of household cleaners, as well as chemicals for vehicles, and the list continues on. If someone has the intent to abuse anything, they can abuse anything. I’ve never misused it, so I can’t say for sure, but I’ve been informed that even if it is overused, kratom is the only one of those things I named that won’t kill you or even damage you other than nausea and/or sleep. However, I’ve never abused it, so I can’t say for sure. additional suggestions. If you have significant chronic pain, you probably already know, and I know, that the medical profession is going to put you on opiate medicines for the remainder of your (probably short) life, which will be of extremely bad quality. Unless you reside in Indiana or Tennessee (the author forgot to include Tennessee, where it became banned in July of last year), you should go on the internet and place an order for some kratom as soon as possible. Please do yourself a favor. It is an incredible analgesic that may last for up to 8 hours; often it only lasts for 4, but when you are in that much agony, even 4 hours of respite is like being in paradise. However, it is merely my recommendation. My own preference is to put my faith in mother nature, which has been the subject of extensive study for decades, rather than in lethal opiate medicines, which, as far as I am aware, kill around one person every eighteen seconds. Nobody has been killed by kratom. You figure out the solution. ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— rick london is a cartoonist, novelist, and singer in addition to being a designer. In addition to this, he is an active supporter of the movement to maintain kratom’s status as a legitimate medical plant. According to him, the most strong kratom may be purchased from a company on the west coast known as kratom-k.com. In addition to the exceptional quality of their products and the competitive rates they provide, London claims they will take an additional 15% off of your entire purchase if you use the discount code “kratom” during the checkout process. rick london is most known for his hilarious odd cartoons and unique presents, which can be found on his website, ricklondongifts.com. kratom, the best kratom, the strongest kratom, kratom treatment, powerful kratom, organic kratom, kratom extract, kratom health, and natural analgesics are some of the articles that are linked to this topic. Send a copy of this article to a friend via email! get email updates including stories much like this one right to your inbox. Today, you may get a free subscription!
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com