In the city, Ayesha lives in a slum. Her mother and father are everyday gamblers. In the neighborhood, she attends a primary school with her brother, who is also a student there. Ayesha is required to miss school if their parents want assistance with their employment. This is their responsibility. Does this seem fair to Ayesha? Now, take into consideration the scenario with ravi. It is a little town that he manages a newspaper for. Because he had the guts to disclose the truth about the wrongdoings of the supposed “benefactor” in the community, he is now doing time in prison. It is impossible for this circumstance to have arisen if she had been aware of the civil services examination. Have ravi been handled in a fair manner? Both of these scenarios, along with a great number of others that you have encountered in your own life, may assist you in gaining a better understanding of the significance of local social norms and the laws of a state in protecting human rights. Who may a person turn to for assistance in the event that these official and informal enforcement bodies are unable to fulfill their jobs? After then, is it possible for a person to file a complaint against Hasher State for violating the “rights guaranteed in the covenants”? The answer is yes if the following conditions are met: (a) the rights that were violated are of a civil or political nature; (b) the counts concerned have signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; and (c) the victim concerned has exhausted all legal means of in-country redress without any success. In accordance with the optional protocol of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), an individual has the ability to lodge a complaint with the human rights committee located in Geneva. The subject is brought up with the nation that is dealing with it by the committee. Moreover, the official remarks of the nation are sent to the individual who feels wronged. The operations that the committee has carried out in accordance with this protocol are reported to the United Nations General Assembly on an annual basis. Unfortunately, India has not signed this optional protocol (which was signed in April of 1999), which means that we are unable to seek protection thanks to this agreement. Then, what happens once the un receives the report about the brat? When it comes to human rights, is it possible to require a government to comply with its obligations? In order to make members of the civil service more attentive to concerns pertaining to fundamental human rights, this topic has to be taught in the course that is about civil services. The United Nations is able to and does interfere in some situations. As an illustration, the United Nations will step in to intervene in situations where a nation does not grant its citizens the right to self-determination, political rights of participation for a democratic government, the right to nationality, the security of foreign nationals, and other similar rights. An intervention by the United Nations may take the form of putting moral, legal, or military pressure on the country that has defaulted on its obligations. On the other hand, there are two significant issues that arise. Initially, due to the fact that the problems are so highly political, it has the potential to result in the treatment of other countries that is incredibly harsh and unjust. The reason for this is because the five states that intervene are the ones that possess the right to veto decisions made by the Security Council. The only people who have the authority to determine the justifications for military action are those individuals. They often have contradictory criteria. One example is that they have not taken any action against the role that China plays in Tibet or the part that Great Britain plays in Northern Ireland. In spite of this, they have managed to twist the arms of Iraq, Somalia, and Haiti.
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com