The remarks that Governor Scott Walker has made about his stance on creationism or Darwinism are being systematically dissected by members of the media, which is not surprising to anybody. When Walker announced that it was a punt, was it really a stand or was it just a punt? The Governor of Wisconsin believes that the subject of whether or not he is a Darwinist has no bearing on the political situation today. It is possible that the majority of Americans are in agreement with him, but the mainstream media is searching for the lowest common denominator in order to ink their rags and criticize one of the most promising prospects for the Republican Party in a very long time. You are still allowed to create a monkey out of yourself even if you are unable to provide evidence that you originated from an ape or a baboon (primate). Despite the fact that this may be the rallying cry or the dogma of evolutionists, the science is not yet resolved, and there is a lack of evidence even in the present day. In the process of making broad and specific assumptions about what occurred billions of years ago, you are not engaging in scientific practice; rather, you are engaging in speculation. You are, very simply, firing blanks, despite the fact that you may seem like an expert on munitions, since you do not have any empirical evidence, repeated observable occurrences, or even a missing link or two. Despite the fact that I repeat it much too often, any depiction of events that occurred billions of years ago is nothing more than “prior philosophic postulation” or nothing more than glorified guessing. With the best in creation science burgeoning with new material on a daily basis, it is becoming quite clear that believing in the Darwin fable may be the dumbest lie, the cruelest hoax, and the most un-provable scientific theory ever laid on a generation. This is why we do not have to allow ourselves to feel stupid for not believing in evolution. We have a plethora of hoaxes from which to draw, such as the Piltdown, Nebraska, Java, and Orce man, to name just a few. However, let us not forget the Neanderthal man, who was plagued by arthritis and was the most beloved of all of them. He was initially proposed as a missing link because of his arthritis. In spite of the fact that Lucy and Ida are now the subject of speculation, they have already been brought into disfavor. Oddly, only a dozen or so have been put forward as proof, and over three quarters of those have been revealed to be hoaxes. It is estimated that after taking into account natural disasters, asteroid strikes, and deadly pandemics, the lowest number of homo sapiens or pre-humans that could have been born in the billions of years that are used in the evolutionist narrative – there should be enough skeletal remains to achieve a journey to the moon and back. Furthermore, evolutionists are attempting to make Scott Walker seem to be an idiot! It would be appropriate to conclude this essay by using a few well-known phrases and sayings from the 1970s and 1980s, such as “where’s the steak” or “get a life.” The Darwinist armory does, in fact, include one real-life, real-time missing link, and it is being used more often than it ever has been before in the history of the movement. The connection is referred to as “political correctness,” and it is the powerful punch of peer pressure that is certain to cause any person who believes in the Bible to break out in perspiration and flee. On the other hand, when first-year college students attended to class in complete silence out of dread that their instructors and classmates could laugh them out of class, that time has long since passed. In today’s world, Darwinists are struggling to find answers to issues that originate from science rather than the Bible. At the same time, evolution is deeply ingrained in contemporary secularism and academics. It is the only story that is permitted to be told in the halls of higher learning institutions. It is the status quo. One thing that Walker is completely correct about is that the evolution story had absolutely no influence either on the political ideas or the personalities of any of the candidates for the presidency. To be honest, when one takes into consideration what Darwinists refer to as evidence, it is quite clear that the theory of evolution does not have any influence on anything. Since the year 2005, Michael Bresciani has been serving as the publisher of American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter.
I love myBlogd
Author
jackemails@gmail.com